tv This Week With George Stephanopoulos ABC October 7, 2012 8:00am-9:00am PDT
good good morning, and welcome to "this week." romney rebounds. ? >> you're entitled, mr. president, to have your own airplane and your own house. >> it re-energizes his campaign. >> i enjoyed that debate a couple of nights ago. that was a great experience. >> and knocks the president on his heels. >> four years ago i said that i'm not a perfect man and i wouldn't be a perfect president and that's probably a promise that governor romney thinks i kept. >> now one month before election day, the big question, can governor romney double down on his debate win and take control of this race? wiil friday's surprisingly strong jobs report -- >> the unemployment rate has fallen to its lowest level since i took office. >> -- stop his momentum? we'll ask top advisers to both candidates, robert gibbs for
obama, ed gillespie for romney. then insight and analysis on our powerhouse round table with our favorite political odd couple, james carville and mary matalin, plus nobel prize winner paul krugman of "the new york times," peggy noonan from "the wall street journal" and abc's jonathan karl. then -- >> and what would you like for christmas, little boy? get off. >> the week's other political slugfest, bill o'reilly joins us live this morning. >> from abc news, "this week" with george stephanopoulos. it's "your voice, your vote." reporting from abc news election headquarters, george stephanopoulos. >> hello, again, just 30 days now until the final votes, and after the most intense week yet of this campaign, mitt romney has momentum. national polls show him gaining ground, and his crowds have picked up, and last night in florida, romney opened up telling about his last visit with an old friend paralyzed in a tragic accident. >> they pushed his wheelchair forward, and he came up, and i reached over and put my arm on
his shoulder, and i whispered into his ear, and i said, billy, i love you, and god bless you. i got a call from a friend that he died the next day after that visit. it's rare that you get the chance to tell someone how much you love them when you still can. >> can romney keep gaining ground, or will president obama maintain his advantage in those battleground states that matter most? we'll look at the race from all angles this morning and we begin with the campaign's ed gillespie for mitt romney, robert gibbs for barack obama and, robert, let me begin with you. how much difference did governor romney make wednesday night? >> well, look, george, i think governor romney had a masterful theatrical performance just this past week, but the underpinnings and foundation of that performance were fundamentally dishonest. look, he walked away from the central tenet of his economic theory by saying he had no idea what the president was talking about. ten minutes after the debate even his own staff is walking back his answers on health care and pre-existing conditions, so, look, i don't want to take anything away from what i think
again was a masterful, masterful performance by governor romney but i don't think governor romney's positions have changed and fundamentally i don't think the campaign changed. >> what happened to the president wednesday night? you've seen all the reviews, and i'm sure the president has seen the reviews, as well. let's look at that "new yorker" cover there, it shows the empty podium next to mitt romney. the basic line is the president didn't show up on wednesday night. i just want to know when did he know he was beat? >> well, look, george, i think the president understood that he hadn't performed up to his own expectations pretty quickly into -- after he got off the stage that night, but, look, george, i think what's interesting, it's not -- i think it's who showed up on the republican side, you know, a clone that looked a lot like mitt romney that had walked away from fundamentally every position that he had taken. you cannot cut taxes by
$5 trillion, as he's doing, and simply say, oh, i don't have that tax cut. i'm not going to cut taxes for the wealthy when the average high-income earner is going to get a $250,000 tax cut. >> let me stop you right there because the romney campaign has a new ad out just on that point and say the president and his team are aligned when they call it a $5 trillion tax cut. >> president obama continues to distort mitt romney's economic plan. the latest, not telling the truth about mitt romney's tax plan. the ap says it doesn't add up. abc news, "mostly fiction." even the obama campaign admitted it it wasn't true. >> well, okay, stipulated it won't be near $5 trillion. >> so does the campaign now accept that the cuts will be less than $5 trillion? >> no, absolutely not. i mean, look, if you're going to reduce the bush tax rates by 20% in the estate tax, in the amt, change the corporate rate and a whole host of other changes, that adds up in a reduction of revenue. the question for governor romney is what loopholes will you close
supposedly to make up for that revenue, and if you don't close $4.8 trillion in those loopholes, two things happen, either the deficit goes up, or more likely is the middle class is going to see their taxes go up. >> but he's saying, as you know, robert, he's stating unequivocally that he will not push the tax cuts if they increase the deficit and that he will not push them if they force back increases on the middle class. >> well, then he has -- then he's got no economic theory. then he's walked away from 18 months of what the whole campaign has been about. but, george, we've seen this movie before where people say, oh, don't worry. it's all going to get paid for. it's fine. when you ask him what loopholes will you close specifically for wealthy earners to help pay for the $4.8 trillion in reduced revenue, there's no answer. i mean, let's be clear. paul ryan a week ago was asked about the math for this, and paul ryan, said, look, the math takes too long. well, mitt romney's solution is he just decided there wasn't math involved in this problem, and that's absolutely crazy. look, the only thing he outlined
that he would cut in the budget is big bird. you know, he's taken the battle straight to "sesame street" and let wall street run hog wild. i mean, again, it was a masterful theatrical performance. it was fundamentally dishonest to the american people, and let's be clear, f you're willing to say anything to get elected president, willing to make up your positions and walk away from them, i think the american people have to understand how can they trust you if you are elected president. >> the vice presidential debate. joe biden coming up. he stepped in it a little bit this week with the comment about the middle class being buried the last four years. take a look. >> how they can justify, how they can justify raising taxes on the middle class that's been buried the last four years. how in lord's name can they justify raising their taxes with these tax cuts? >> two questions, is there more pressure on the vice president now to be aggressive coming off
the president's debate, and are you worried about gaffes like that? >> well, look, i don't think that was a gaffe, george. i think what the vice president was talking about is what he's talked about every day, which is a series of eight years of -- >> he said they were buried the last four years. >> well, we've been digging out for what was an avalanche of bad economic decisions over the past eight years during the bush administration, and what mitt romney and paul ryan want to do is take us back to that exact same failed economic theory, talk down tax cuts, eviscerating the investments we know we need to grow our economy from the middle out rather than from the top down. look, i know vice president biden. i know he's looking forward to having a spirited exchange about ideas. i simply hope this, i hope what paul ryan does is something fundamentally different than what mitt romney does, and that is i hope he comes with just a modicum of truth and willing to defend their policies rather than to admit somehow they don't exist. >> and, finally, will we see a different game from president obama in the next debate?
>> well, again, i think now that barack obama has had the opportunity to meet both mitt romneys, i don't doubt that he'll make some adjustments. i know he's looking forward to the next debate. >> robert gibbs, thanks very much for your time this morning. >> george, thanks for having me. >> let's hear from the romney campaign. ed gillespie joining us this important. ed, thanks for getting up this morning. you heard robert right there, masterful, theatrical, fundamentally dishonest. i guess his basic point now about governor romney on his tax plan is either that he's not telling the truth about the scale of the tax plan or abandoning his economic theory. which one is it? >> well, the problem they have is that the debate's performance on wednesday evening was not a matter of style, it was a matter of substance, and governor romney laid out a plan for turning this economy around, getting things moving again. he had a fact-based critique of president obama's failed policies that the president was unable to respond to, and today and since then, the obama campaign, they remind me a little bit of a 7-year-old losing a checker game and
then instead of being frustrated at the outcome, they sweep the board off the table. the fact is is that if president obama's re-elected, as governor romney pointed out, we'll have continued chronically high unemployment, we're going to have continued massive debt instead of moving toward a balanced budget. we've had this week the fourth trillion dollar deficit under this president, health care premiums are going to continue to rise. up to 20 million americans will lose their employer-based health insurance under obama care, and they'll raise $716 billion from medicare. governor romney has a different approach that would move the country in the right direction and that's what they're frustrated about. >> let's talk about that approach and get to the bottom of this disagreement. governor romney says he will not increase the deficit with his tax cuts. he's saying he will not increase taxes on the middle class, so is he saying that if he cannot come up with enough loopholes and deductions, closing the deductions to pay for the tax cuts, which amount
to about $5 trillion, that he will scale them back? >> what he has said, george, he is going to cut tax rates across the board by 20% and offset those cuts with eliminating deductions and loopholes for the upper income families. >> but there aren't enough deductions to pay for that. >> for middle class families. you can pay for it. there are six studies that say that you can do that. you can broaden the base and lower the rates. that would foster economic growth, and we've done that in the past. there's one study that says that you can -- that uses the word "assume" or "assumption" 68 times by a liberal think tank and that's what gibbs and others point to. >> if it does turn out that the deductions do not make up for the cost of the tax cuts, does governor romney say that he will scale back the tax cuts? >> what he has said is it's going to be -- he's not going to increase the deficit in bringing down the rates and broadening -- >> so he won't scale back the tax cuts? >> we saw that done, by the way, as you know, when tip o'neill
was the speaker of the house and ronald reagan was the president of the united states, and they worked together on a very important and significant tax reform. we believe that it's time for that again and that you can do that working across the aisle. obviously governor romney, if he becomes president, would hope to have republican majorities in the house and the senate, but you would have to work across the aisle, and we believe it can be done and there are six studies that show it can. >> but the promise that takes precedence and i do want to move on is about not increasing the deficit. you heard robert gibbs talk about big bird and the targeting of big bird by governor romney. coming out of that pbs cited poll showing it's the most trusted public institution and it only takes about 0.01% of the federal budget and not seeing big bird show up. was it a mistake to target him? >> george, it wasn't a targeting. it was a, you know, just pointing to one example. as you know, governor romney would move us toward a balanced budget with a 5% cut in nonsecurity discretionary spending and eliminate a number
of perhaps and consolidate a number of others. i think with jim lehrer there from pbs, he made the point from a joking reference. look, you have to borrow money from china to pay for these programs, is it worth it? that's the test that should be applied if we impose it on future generations. big bird, i can tell you, as the father of three children grown now, but any father who's gone to a toy store knows that big bird is a pretty commercially successful entity and whether or not we should be subsidizing it, and you can cite, oh, it's not that big a percentage of the budget, that's true, but every penny that you raise as a potential cut seems to be sacred with this administration and you can't cut it, and they demagogue it, and i think the american people understand this is a big election and a big choice. >> let's talk -- >> you have to make some tough decisions and have to find some things where it's not worth borrowing money and imposing debt on future generations, big bird would be pretty successful, i suspect, without a government federal subsidy and all that debt. >> let's talk about friday's job numbers. it raised some suspicions
among governor romney's allies. on friday morning, jack welch, the former chairman of ge said unbelievable job numbers. these chicago guys will do anything. can't debate so change numbers. steve forbes follows up and says welch is right. does governor romney put any stock in those theories and have any suspicions at all about the bls numbers? >> george, the numbers themselves are very damning. when you look at it, we had fewer jobs created in september than were created in august, fewer jobs created in august than were created in july. our unemployment rate has come down because for -- since president obama took office, for every new job created, more than six workers have left the labor force. if labor force participation was what it was when the president took office, unemployment would be around 10.7%. these jobs that were added in september were largely part-time jobs. so we still have 23 million americans -- that number has not
changed at all -- who are either unemployed or out of work entirely or are underemployed working or out of the workforce entirely or underemployed working part time instead of full time or not in a job commensurate with their skills, half of the college students coming out of, you know, with degrees today are unable to find a job. this economy is not doing well and the fact that you have a white house celebrating an unemployment rate of 7.8% with 23 million americans out of work or unemployed or underemployed tells you a lot about the failure of this administration's policies, george. >> final question, bottom line, did governor romney do what he needed to do on wednesday to take control of this race? >> well, i think there was certainly a shift in the dynamic. people saw the real mitt romney. i think that's why you saw the reviews. i know, george, that you thought it was a tie, but most other objective viewers felt governor romney did do a very good job in making a case for his policies and that president obama was unable to defend his past policies nor put forward a vision for future policies in the way governor romney did but the most important thing is nearly 70 million americans saw
the real mitt romney, not what they've been seeing in 30-second attack ads or in 12-second snippets on the evening news. they got to see and take a measure of him, and i think they saw someone, not only who could be president by virtue of his experience in being a leader with being able to reach across the aisle as governor of massachusetts, but someone who has a plan to get this economy moving again, which the president clearly does not. >> actually, ed. that's not what i said. you ought to look at the whole quote but thanks for coming in. we'll right back with our powerhouse roundtable in just 60 seconds. seconds. under my town. it's a game changer. ♪ it means cleaner, cheaper american-made energy. but we've got to be careful how we get it. design the wells to be safe. thousands of jobs. use the most advanced technology to protect our water. billions in the economy. at chevron, if we can't do it right, we won't do it at all. we've got to think long term. we've got to think long term. ♪
we'veit's something you're long teborn with. we've got to think long term. and inspires the things you choose to do. you do what you do... because it matters. at hp we don't just believe in the power of technology. we believe in the power of people when technology works for you. to dream. to create. to work. if you're going to do something. make it matter. back now with the roundtable. george will is off, but we are joined by peggy noonan of "the wall street journal." nobel prize-winning economist paul krugman of "the new york times," jon karl of abc news and my favorite married couple, james carville and mary matalin. the debate right now, you could not have been tougher on president obama's performance in your column yesterday. >> yeah, i thought the president
barely showed. i thought "the new yorker" covered the now famous "new yorker" cover in which they had a candidate romney at a podium looking at the empty chair where mr. obama would have been, captured it all. i am very curious about what the heck happened. was it a strategic mistake on the part of the obama campaign to play it a certain way and it didn't work, or were there other factors involved? to me it is a mystery and one of those delicious things that will probably be answered in the big books about 2012, but, yes, the president was bad, mitt romney was good. >> you ought to jump right in. >> this is classic obama. he really, really wants to be the president of national unity. he's always wanted to be the reconciliation candidate, and his instincts always in confrontations is to not go for the jugular but to go for the capillary. he did the same thing in 2008. people forget how weak his campaign was through august of 2008 when he just was refusing to make the obvious case against mccain, and then he toughened up but also --
>> in the debate he toughened up in 2008. >> because he needs to be -- have his back against the wall, but this was classic. this was the real obama who does not like -- he really wants to be a president of the whole nation. he somehow has a hard time wrapping his mind around the necessity of taking a tougher line. >> i said on cnn, i dpts want to come to this conclusion but sitting watching i have to come to it. he just didn't want to be there. >> was it his strategy? >> i don't think it was. we'll know the next debate. i mean he's obviously either got to be different or it's going to be pretty bad, but just looked like to me he really didn't want to be there. his mind wasn't on it. he didn't want to engage. he just wanted to get through the 90 minutes, and i'm sure he's a very competitive guy. i hope -- knock on wood -- we'll see a different president obama at hofstra. >> how can a president feel that way, i don't want to be there during a debate for -- >> you know, reagan got lost on the pacific coast.
i don't know. the answer is i don't know but that was the impression that i got. >> president obama going into that debate, winning, ahead in every single battleground state. i mean he was -- looked to me like a guy that was running out the clock. he was ahead. obviously there was a strategic decision not to bring up bain capital, not to bring up the 47%. >> they disagree and say he was prepared for all of that. what i was more surprised, mary, sort of picking up on the points of blurring the differences that paul was making, when social security came up, president obama says, well, mitt romney and i basically agree on social security. >> can i state the obvious since we all have theorys? the obvious is he didn't bring his game because he doesn't have a game. they have now blamed his performance on everything from strategic he's a unifier. that's belied by his campaign calling mitt romney everything from a liar to a tax thief to a felon to a murderer to a dog abuser to a misogynist. this is one of the most negative campaigns in history and blame jim lehrer -- >> it was the altitude. >> the altitude, okay.
he has no game. the only way the truth that this president likes to cite all the time, he has inherited the worst economy in history would be if he gets re-elected, this is the worst recovery in the history of this country, and his notion that it takes a long time to get out is belied also by history. >> that's actually not true. just in the measure of the recovery, it's way better than bush's recovery. actual growth since the bottom is a lot better so we're supposed to talk about that later but this is not true. you can argue with the unemployment rate is high because it was a hell of a recession but this is not -- >> professor krugman, can i say something about history? has there ever been this not be true in history that the deeper the -- the deeper the recession, the steeper and stronger the recovery? there is no such thing as a deep recession with a moderate recovery. >> every financial crisis, financial, post-financial crisis economies look like this. we look like a post-financial crisis economy. we look exactly like a standard post-recovery -- look all post-financial crisis -- look
all through. look at sweden in the '90s, look at japan, we're doing a little bit better than the average track on these things, but, no, i'm bitterly critical of obama's performance in the debate, but this is not the way to criticize him. >> why didn't he bring up a lot of many points like on the auto bailout where there's been progress thanks to a decision the president made? >> you know, i don't know the answer to that. and if it's something -- but i think we're going to see a different president obama in the next one. i don't know why he did that. you know, sometimes in life you just have a bad night. anybody that follows sports knows that. sometimes it's the most logical explanation is the real one. he just had a bad night. >> he would say things like in the '90s we had good job growth but in recent years we haven't. someone couldn't bring himself initially to say under clinton we had great job growth and under bush, we had lousy. that's just him. his natural instinct to to blur the partisan differences. i think that will change in the next debate. >> you're definitely going to
see a different obama in the next debate. he will go right at romney. this is going to be an entirely different debate. >> i think that's right. one of the other questions, peggy, will we see a different kind of moderation? this was a brand-new format where jim lehrer, he wanted to get out of the way and said he was effective in doing that. do you agree? >> i completely agree. i thought jim lehrer was absolutely great, and it was a relief. i didn't even know in advance that this agreement had been made that the way the moderator would moderate would be a little more laid back. this is what it was. jim lehrer is old school and a pro. he didn't think it was all about him. he didn't think it was about getting the camera on him. he didn't think it was about him being the anchor with the whip. you know what i mean? he would ask a question, and he would let these two guys either challenge each other or not, either lean back or lean forward, either take issue or not. he left it up to them, that was great because they are the ones running for president, not the critics. >> the critics were liberals,
because they know obama cannot perform under those circumstances where he has to think on his feet, where he has to make sense of this recovery, which is the worst in history, which continues to result in no job growth whatsoever. that's the reality people are living. >> but can -- i don't want to skip by without talking about the facts issue. >> we have plenty of time coming up. >> i don't know whether to blame lehrer or to blame the president but it was kind of amazing because romney was not only saying things that are not true, he was saying things that his own campaign had previously said weren't true. the one that got me was not the stuff about taxes but the thing about covering people with pre-existing conditions which his plan does not which he has said that before and his campaign has walked it back in the past and there he was right again saying, well, my plan covers pre-existing conditions which is displaying a kind of contempt for the public -- >> you think it's the moderator's job -- >> no, but the contempt for the whole process. the contempt for us thinking the news media will not cover on me
as long as they say forcefully i won -- >> now you're saying the press is against obama now? >> to let them know how to handle untruths. >> look, they asked one time lee trevino, great golfer, who was having trouble with putting and asked if he thought he needed a new putter, and he claims to have said "it's not the arrows, it's the indians." it's not jim lehrer. president obama was sitting right there. he could have confronted governor romney on any number of issues and drowning the distinction. >> isn't our job to actually never mind that the quality of the theatrical performance but to ask about, were there untruths spoken in that debate and there were a lot. >> about that -- >> because president obama was loose with the facts. >> they were minor. >> ah. >> he said -- >> $4 trillion plan to cut the deficit. >> he said health care premiums are rising at the slowest rate in 50 years. >> those are minor compared with --
>> you know what, let's dig into those when we come back. take a quick break. a lot more roundtable including previewing the vp debate and last time it inspired "saturday night live." >> with barack obama you're going to be paying higher taxes, but not with me and my fellow maverick. we're not afraid to get mavericky in there and ruffle some feathers and not allow that and also to the great ronald reagan. >> and later "this week's" other big debate. >> american foreign policy has been to go into the middle east and try to buy friends. does that ever work? >> yeah, we can buy friends. >> i think it works. >> bill o'reilly live in our no-spin zone. [ male announcer ] we're all on a journey to financial independence. ♪ whether you're just beginning the journey... ♪
...starting a family... ♪ ...or entering a new chapter of your life. while the journey is yours, pacific life can help you protect and grow the assets you'll need along the way. to learn how, visit pacificlife.com. pacific life. the power to help you succeed. hey, it's sandra -- from accounting. peter. i can see that you're busy... but you were gonna help us crunch the numbers for accounts receivable today. i mean i know that this is important. well, both are important. let's be clear. they are but this is important too. [ man ] the receivables. [ male announcer ] michelin knows it's better for xerox to help manage their finance processing. so they can focus on keeping the world moving. with xerox, you're ready for real business.
bp has paid overthe people of bp twenty-threeitment to the gulf. billion dollars so they can focus on keeping the world moving. to help those affected and to cover cleanup costs. today, the beaches and gulf are open, and many areas are reporting their best tourism seasons in years. and bp's also committed to america. we support nearly 250,000 jobs and invest more here than anywhere else. we're working to fuel america for generations to come. our commitment has never been stronger. [ male announcer ] how do you turn an entrepreneur's dream... ♪
into a scooter that talks to the cloud? ♪ or make 70,000 trades a second... ♪ reach one customer at a time? ♪ how do you help doctors turn billions of bytes of shared information... ♪ into a fifth anniversary of remission? ♪ or turn 30-million artifacts... ♪ into a high-tech masterpiece? ♪ whatever your business challenge, dell has the technology and services to help you solve it.
♪ hey baby there ain't no easy way out ♪ >> nice to meet you. hey, can i call you joe? >> you can call me joe. >> john mccain has been dead wrong. i love him. as my mother would say, god love him, but he's been dead wrong on the fundamental issues relating to the conduct of war. >> i would like more opportunity for this. i like being able to answer these tough questions without the filter even of the mainstream media kind of telling viewers what they've just heard. >> no one in the united states senate has been a better friend to israel than joe biden. >> i may not answer the questions the way that either the moderator or you want to hear, but i'm going to talk straight to the american people and let them know my track record also. >> that was four years ago. the next vp debate is thursday night. working on the roundtable
we'll preview that in just a little bit. peggy noonan, paul krugman, jon karl, mary matalin and james carville. the unemployment numbers that came out friday. i got to say, peggy, i was surprised first thing at "gma," the numbers come out, the first tweet you get from jack welch raising a question about them. ed gillespie didn't bite but what is that about? >> oh, it's about widespread skepticism towards the actions and efforts of the u.s. government to begin with. second, i don't think anybody in america looks at the number, whether it's 8.2, 8.4, 7.7, and thinks that's a real reflection of reality. everybody in america thinks they're not counting the number of people who have stopped looking, the number of people who are underemployed. at that point the 7.8 number almost becomes academic. nobody has faith. >> look, we know it's a lousy labor market out there. it's not what you want to have, however, it's an improve ing
labor market and not because of one month's numbers but one month, the whole thing, jack welch probably coming from the corporate world, he doesn't quite understand how it is to fudge government numbers. but the -- if you look over the past year, which is what you should do, you should not look at the numbers, there's a clear improvement. it's clear that adjusted for the changing and for the aging of the population, the number of people with jobs this year of the relevant population is rising, clear that the payroll growth has exceeded population growth. so this is an economy that is slowly on the mend, and in a way the aberration was not this last month's number, but the previous two months' numbers where the unemployment rate didn't fall even though the underlying situation was -- >> you know, you brought up a trend over the last year and i'll come to you in a second, jon. this chart showing that trend across several presidencies of the last year of an incumbent running for president and does show, mary matalin, that president obama is the improvement in the re-election year is in the green zone where presidents get re-elected. >> the real world peggy alluded to. real medium incomes have fallen twice as much under the obama
recovery as they did in the bush recession. at this point in time under ronald reagan's policies, which governor reagan has a 21st century application of, jobs grew at five times the rate they are. let's look at the states with 17 governors, republican governors instituted reforms. those states are growing their economy and creating jobs at twice the rate the national one is. this is about policies. we know they've worked. there is no recovery in the history of any recessions or depressions that have been as slow and as poor as this one and the revisions upwards -- yes, it does, professor/dr. krugman. it's completely totally true. i don't make up numbers. >> well, but just look at them then. the fact of the matter is this is actually a fairly typical slow post-financial crisis recovery, which is picking up speed, so although it's
terrible, and i've been bitterly critical of policymakers in general for not doing more, the fact of the matter is we are clearly now in the upswing where you can see the beginnings of a turnaround. >> the challenge for romney is that, look, it's not just the unemployment number here, consumer confidence has been up for six weeks in a row, you've got the stock market is up. you have housing prices are up. there's a sense that things are still bad but getting better, especially, george, in the battleground states. you've got the governor of florida going around talking about the recovery in florida. you've got republicans -- >> republican governors. >> in ohio -- >> yes, but how do you run against the economy when you have republican governors -- >> as you said -- they're being replaced by republicans are growing the economy. >> you have -- you have a situation where welch put this out. now, here's a party that a large number of believe in creationism and deny global warming, think that obama was not born in the united states, believe that tax cuts raise revenue so -- >> and -- >> it's not surprising they're going to believe somehow or another to be --
this is economic birtherism. that's what it is. >> you have to keep your eyes just for a second on the fundamentals. >> thank you. >> one of the reasons people don't think things are getting better economically is not only because they have eyes, but because they know our fundamentals are bad, the spending is terrible, the tax structure isn't competitive. they're looking down the road and seeing -- >> and prices have doubled. health care premiums have gone up. >> move to not make it better. maybe change would be a good job in order to get growth. >> but that's an imaginary public you're talking about. polls show that the economy is now dead even despite the lousy absolute state of the economy, people think that obama -- >> you know as well as i do spending continues to be huge but our tax system isn't competitive and everybody out there worries about that. oh, my god. >> people's optimism about the economy is increasing a little bit. broad spectrum of consumer confidence -- >> i'm going to say one thing about this whole conspiracy theory.
i went down to bls and talked to the woman in her cubicle who wrote the announcement, 7.8%. there is not a single political employee in the entire bls right now, not one. i mean this is crazy town to think that it was -- >> when you say people don't trust government, this is the most trustworthy. i mean, there are the inherent problems of economic data which are all science faction, but these are honestly constructed science fiction. >> most people don't understand, you do, obviously, but how this is done. this is a survey of 60,000 households. george, eighth a survey. it last a margin of error. >> about 400,000 jobs it could be. >> the margin is 0.2%. you could have 8% unemployment. >> the survey of employers and households and they're telling the same story of an economy that is slowly on the mend, slowly but slowly on end. >> it's a belly crawl. it's a belly crawl. you like to talk about your data, professor. here's political data. 80% or three-quarters of seniors, women, men and independents think that the obama policies did not help either their personal situation
or the economy. majorities of women, men, independents and seniors and small business believe that the obama policies have hurt the economy. this is about policies. it is -- you want me to read your data. i'm saying read our data. >> the reality -- the point is that in boasting about the unemployment number, you know, the obama people are making too much out of one month's number which everybody does but there's a fundamental truth that things are getting better. not as fast as they should by a long shot. we're maybe a quarter of the way back from the damage that was done by the financial crisis, but we are making our way back. >> so when you look at both events, and let me ask you all to weigh in, how much did the race change this week? >> i think it changed. i think romney helped himself but i think this is a clarifying event because now the republicans are enthusiastic
about romney, and they're enthusiastic about ryan. the winner of this race will have real legitimacy. this is not going to be a thing where they say, well, he really didn't represent our caution. now that -- if the president wins re-election, then you're going to see sort of policies along the clinton line when it comes to tax on top earners. you're going to see the health care bill stay in place. you'll see regulation of wall street stay in place and see these things happen. if by the same token if romney wins, he'll have the authority of an election behind him, so i think this gives the next president a real boost when he gets in there. >> i think one of the key things about the debate is it's change -- we will look back on it as an historic moment in this election. it upended things. this is what it upended. barack obama was supposed to be the sort of moderate centrist fellow who looked at mitt romney, this extreme, strange fellow. by the time that debate was over, mitt romney seemed a completely moderate centrist figure who showed up as mitt romney the governor, not as mitt romney the candidate.
>> except that everything he used to clean his centrism wasn't true, so this is a question, does that start to take its toll over the next few months? >> i think that is unjust. i mean to say the very least -- >> he came -- >> when you say -- >> when you say my plan cover s pre-existing conditions when it doesn't and when your own campaign admits it doesn't, that's amazing. >> you have mitt characterized and you have lied about every position and every particular of the ryan plan on medicare from the efficiency of medicare administration to calling it a voucher plan so you're hardly -- >> it's a voucher plan. >> you're hardly credible on calling somebody else a liar. >> but the fact of the matter, i just think that pre-existing condition thing was a defining moment. it was saying this guy believes not only he can say something not true but something his own
campaign admitted wasn't true and say it in front of 70 million people. that's amazing. >> the other thing that offended was governor romney effectively shut down the legions that obama has erected against him and mitt romney, the real mitt romney is, what has belied all the stereotypes and demonic mischaracterizations of him, $300 million of attack ads so people got to see, as ed said, the real mitt romney, and they liked his positions and supported all those positions and liked hip as a person. >> mitt romney also nailed the president on not working well with the other party and made the point that he can work well with the other party as he did in massachusetts. >> yes, set the record for -- >> for vetoes in massachusetts. >> yeah. >> exactly. >> but i'm not -- >> democratic legislation, you have a veto a few things. >> the choice is going to be, do you go back to the clinton tax rates on people that earn over $250,000 and do you keep the health care bill in place or repeal it? do you keep wall street regulation in place or do you
repeal it? do you have a foreign policy that leads with diplomacy, not war? that's going to be the consequence of this election. it may not be like everybody wants it but the new president is going to come in with real authority. gladys knight getting back to your question, george -- >> static about romney/ryan now. >> thi is a new race after that debate. imagine if romney had come in and had a terrible performance, you have what happened before and the jobs number on friday, it would have effectively been over. this now is a real race, republican fund-raising has picked up dramatically this week. look at the crowds he had just yesterday in florida. he is a new candidate. he is somebody now who has enthusiasm. >> he definitely got back in the game but we'll be watching where the polls are in the battleground states, especially ohio. let's look ahead to the vice presidential debate. both vice president biden and paul ryan setting expectations this week. >> you're not going to rattle joe biden. joe biden has been on the national stage, he ran for president twice, he's a sitting vice president. what i hope to achieve is to give people an alternative. >> i just want to make sure that when i say these things, that i
don't have the congressman saying, no, no, no, i don't have that position or that's not the governor's position, and so it's mainly getting the factual predicates for everything. >> now, this debate is going to cover a lot of topics including night, but, james, it is clear from talking to both ed gillespie and robert gibbs this morning they're going to continue to zero in on this whole issue of the romney tax cuts. is it vouchers or not? what is governor romney's -- >> as they should. as they should, but what romney proposed was he was going to cut tax rates to 20% for everybody, that's $4.8 trillion over 10 years. what they're saying is how are you going to pay for this? he says, with unspecified, unspecified -- >> big bird. >> they should hone in on that. as paul has pointed out, paul ryan's plan just calls for cuts. doesn't say what the sort of cuts are. that's a legitimate thing in an election. what could be more legitimate than that? >> still the fact of the matter is that ryan -- despite, you know, however he manages to put
it across and however how aggressively, romney is calling for his tax cuts for the rich, which he says he'll make up for and refused to say anything. this is amazing. you say i'm going to raise $5 trillion revenue but i'm not going to tell you how to offset those -- >> like you said, max cap deductions of $17,000. >> hasn't committed -- >> no plan at all. >> it's amazing. $5 trillion. >> the only -- professor krugman's argument is to cherry pick data. he does not look at even the most recent study by harvard researchers, your sort of colleagues. >> that was a -- you can do it as long as you include people with incomes between 100,000 and $250,000. >> i didn't finish my point. the biggest impediment to our economy is entitlements and medicare and the ryan plan -- we're not just talking about a tax reform but regulatory reform that costs $10,000 per employee that's a
drag on the economy and we're talking about fixing medicare, reforming medicare which the harvard guy said had his plan been in place would have reduced spending by 9% in one year. >> the guy is martin feldstein of -- >> i'm talking about the american medical association report. >> this is -- well, look, you know, romney has not given -- >> i don't understand why it's not clear to say we want to lower the rate, widen the base. we will work at -- this is a grown-up thing -- i will have a legislature. >> but, peggy -- >> we will work this out. >> peggy -- >> ronald reagan did this reform, tax reform in '86. it was a negotiation. >> people are talking about '82. ronald reagan signed on to one of the largest -- one of the largest tax increases -- >> that was a tax -- >> that's why -- >> tax reform -- >> kept it from exploding. >> worked out -- >> you have to have some notion of what you want to do. >> the issue here is that, you know, romney has not put any of the details out.
i mean, that is true. he's thrown some ideas. he said he's going to balance the budget in seven to ten years while doing tax reform, while increasing defense spending, not touching medicare. i mean there's a lot of things that don't add up but because romney has not given the details doesn't give the president the right to make them up for him. i mean, he is not going to have a $5 trillion net tax cut. >> absolutely good at details -- >> that's not his plan. >> but i think to say there's a $5 trillion tax cut to be offset by mystery meat. you know, that's a correct statement. >> or -- >> there's a $5 trillion tax cut, well, but we don't know what it is he's going to do but what he proposed is a $5 trillion tax cut plus he says, trust me, i'll do something he different. that's not a very good -- >> yes. what can be more legitimate than saying you're proposing $5 trillion in a reduction in revenue. how are you going to pay for this, and he says i'm not going to tell you, i'll just let the congress do it. so you say, no, these are the things you have to get rid of.
get rid of t child deduction or home mortgage deduction. >> and we're going to have -- he said it. you just don't listen to -- >> the end of the story -- >> you don't want to -- he already wrote the bill. do you want him to be more specific so that you can rouse people against this or -- >> absolutely, absolutely. >> and keep anything good or helpful from happening with regard to cutting -- >> i think he needs to tell the truth. i do. you're right. >> i want to have all of you back after the next debate. we have a lot more to talk you obviously have a lot more to talk about. that was a fantastic roundtable. thank you all, and for you at home that want to weigh in, jon karl will answer your questions @jonkarl. in just 60 seconds i go one-on-one with bill o'reilly. there he is. know about itself? can it know when it needs to be repaired? and when it doesn't? in industries like manufacturing and energy, they're using predictive analytics to detect signs of trouble helping some companies save millions on maintenance, because machines seek help before they're broken.
it daept matter right wing or left wing, all right. you go in, and you're a hater, radio, cable, in print, whatever, you get paid. >> and live now fresh off his rumble in the air-conditioned auditorium with jon stewart, bill o'reilly, thanks for coming in this morning. >> george, i'm still asleep though stephanopoulos. take it easy on me. >> i doubt that. but let's pick up on what you were saying right there talking about political assassin, kind of dangerous territory for anyone in political television. who are you calling out? >> i'm not going to name them but if you don't know them then you're not living in the usa. i mean, they're all over the place and they just attack people personally for money, and that's just the way it is. >> there was also a lot of hate flowing on twitter last night about the technical glitches in the rumble. i'm sure you have seen some. what can you guys do about it? a lot wanted to see the debate and couldn't tune in. >> yeah, we saw that problem. everybody is going to get to see
it, and it's $4.95. if you want your money back, it's going to charity anyway, but we'll do it. it crashed. the server crashed. we had so many people coming in. but anybody who wants to see it now can see it. and that means you didn't have to sign up -- you can sign up now, and it's worth seeing. i mean it's a battle between socialism and capitalism, and it's funny and lively, so check it out on rumble2012.com. >> it was, and you guys were not afraid to go at it. you kind of like each other a lot, as well. let's talk about the other debate this week. you just heard the roundtable here. could have used you in the middle of all these guys, strong opinions about how much changed this week. what's your bet? >> well, look, the problem that your panelists -- the problem with this is that they're all micro -- oh, he did this. look, the election is about philosophy. just like stewart and i were debating last night, it's about direction of the country. are we going into the western european quasi-socialism, or are
we going to get back to robust capitalism? what are we going to do here? all right, the micro is important, but it's not the dominant theme, which direction do you want america to go in? >> it sounds to me then like you agree with james carville on that point that this is a big election, a clarifying election and whoever wins will have a mandate for quite different approaches. >> absolutely. you know, carville is right for the first time in his life. this is huge because we have a lot of americans who are saying, you know what, i want stuff. i want stuff, from stephanopoulos, he makes a lot of money, give me stuff, whereas i was raised in my town of you make your own way and, of course, we want safety nets for people who are hurt. of course. every american fair-minded wants that, but it's a philosophy of life that's in play here. >> okay, so you and carville agree. we've achieved something this morning. also, you're -- >> don't spread that around,
though. >> you just said it on national television. brand-new book "killing kennedy" along with your co-writer martin dugard, the historian. i know you say you're not a professional historian, but after working on this book, what is your bottom line on the assassination? >> if you want to know how john f. kennedy governed and was killed, i mean in micro detail "killing kennedy" is the book for you. it's a no-spin book, no bs. this is who the man was, this is how he governed in the most difficult times in his administration, and this is how he died, and we just lay it out and the things that we don't know and there are some, we tell the reader, we cannot get to the bottom of this, but the book has sold 200,000 copies in its first three days of release, it's a monster, and i just hope everybody checks it out. >> bill o'reilly, congratulations on that. thanks for coming in this morning. all of you at home can check out an excerpt of bill's new book "killing kennedy" on our website, abcnews.com/thisweek. and now -- ♪ life is a highway
>> -- three moments from this week's history. what year was it? >> there's no police presence down here. they will not enter the area. >> the rodney king riots in l.a. >> people were appalled at the jury verdict asking how could they be not guilty? we saw them beating rodney king. ♪ >> charles and diana split. >> it is announced from buckingham palace that with regret, the prince and princess of wales have decided to separate. >> and dan quayle made that infamous mistake. >> you're right phonetically, there you go. >> was it in 1990, 1991 or 1992? we'll be right back with the answer. answer. all energy development comes with some risk, t was in 1990, 1991 or 1992? we'll be right back with the answer. was in 1990, 1991 or 19? we'll be right back with the answer. was in 1990, 1991 or 199? we'll be right back with the answer. ...protect water - through conservation and self-contained recycling systems... ... and protect land - by reducing our footprint and respecting wildlife. america's natural gas...
domestic, abundant, clean energy to power our lives... that's smarter power today. and having an investment expert like northern trust by your side makes all the difference. we add precision to your portfolio construction by directly matching your assets and your risk preferences against your own unique life goals. we call it goals driven investing. after all, you don't climb a mountain just to sit at the top. you look around for other mountains to climb. ♪ expertise matters. find it at northern trust. [ male announcer ] how do you turn an entrepreneur's dream... ♪ into a scooter that talks to the cloud? ♪ or make 70,000 trades a second... ♪
reach one customer at a time? ♪ how do you help doctors turn billions of bytes of shared information... ♪ into a fifth anniversary of remission? ♪ or turn 30-million artifacts... ♪ into a high-tech masterpiece? ♪ whatever your business challenge, dell has the technology and services to help you solve it. so what year was it, when did we see a royal divorce and race riots in l.a.? 20 years ago, 1992. and now we honor our fellow americans who serve and sacrifice. this week the pentagon released the names of seven soldiers and marines killed in afghanistan.
we'll be right back. we'll be right back. made a commitment to the gulf.ep and every day since, we've worked hard to keep it. bp has paid over twenty-three billion dollars to help people and businesses who were affected, and to cover cleanup costs. today, the beaches and gulf are open for everyone to enjoy -- and many areas are reporting their best tourism seasons in years. we've shared what we've learned with governments and across the industry so we can all produce energy more safely. i want you to know, there's another commitment bp takes just as seriously: our commitment to america. bp supports nearly two-hundred-fifty thousand jobs in communities across the country. we hired three thousand people just last year. bp invests more in america than in any other country. in fact, over the last five years, no other energy company has invested more in the us than bp.
we're working to fuel america for generations to come. today, our commitment to the gulf, and to america, has never been stronger. because they couldn't see what made people different. today, retailers from the us to japan are using analytics to find insight in social chatter, reviews and sales transactions. helping some companies increase online revenue up to 50% by offering customers an experience as unique as they are. that's what i'm working on. i'm an ibmer. let's build a smarter planet. then don't get nickle and dimed by high cost investments and annoying account fees. at e-trade, our free easy-to-use online tools and experienced retirement specialists can help you build a personalized plan. and with our no annual fee iras and a wide range of low cost investments, you can execute the plan you want at a low cost.
so meet with us, or go to etrade.com for a great retirement plan with low cost investments. ♪ and that il for us and that is all for us today. thanks for sharing part of your sunday with us. check out "world news" with david muir tonight and tune in thursday for "one-on-one, the candidates debate." joe biden and paul ryan face off at 9:00, 8:00 pacific. i'll see you tomorrow on "gma."
>> in the news this sunday morning even beggar crowds expected this weekend for all the events. how to navigate it all. we will have a live report. and an occupy san jose demonstrators return to campus city hall but this time they have announced a departure date. >> good morning. live from mount tam, fog and low clouds are around parts of the bay but still sunshine and filed temperatures are to come.